Munaeem's Blog

A political independent and moderate’s comments, analysis and links on important stories in the news

Why did Musharraf impose emergency despite American oppostion?

President Pervez Musharraf declared a state of emergency despite American opposition and threats. He suspended the constitution and removed the Chief Justice Iftiqar. He has appointed a new chief and high court justices of the provinces. It is shocking to know none of these justices opposed him and took oath under new PCO.

Critics are saying he has angered Americans and will face suspension of the billions of dollars of military and economic aid.

In my opinion, he imposed the American rule after consultation with the Bush Administration. Officially, Americans gave statements showing displeasure over his actions.

Americans were also unhappy with the Chief Justice Iftiqar because had released many high profile al-qaeda suspects. Recently he had ordered the government to release all the missing persons by November 13.




Add a Comment

Mark Kraft from United States
November, 03, 2007 10:22 PM
Greetings.

In response to Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf's <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071103/ts_nm/pakistan_emergency_dc_9;_ylt=AkHgPGRcyeP9rARMFRLKB0sE1vAI">declaration of martial law</a> and illegal dismissal of a Pakistani Supreme Court Justice, I am encouraging all bloggers out there who want true democratic rule for Pakistan's 165 million people to unite in opposition.

From now on, I am asking bloggers to consistantly refer to Musharraf as "<a href="http://insomnia.livejournal.com/771171.html">Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf</a>" consistantly linking back to a post I made explaining this idea in greater detail.

The post allows threaded comments, so that those opposed to Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf can start discussing ways that we can organize and unite in opposition to his dictatorial actions.

My hope is that a consistant message of opposition to martial law and support for democracy in Pakistan can help to influence the media away from legitimizing the Musharraf regime by referring to him as a President. By definition, he cannot be a President if he refuses the right for his government's Supreme Court to decide whether his running for office is legal or not.

Please drop by the post, leave a comment as to what ideas you have on how we can best unite in opposition to martial law, and please do consider using the phrase "Pakistani dictator Pervez Musharraf", linking back to the post.

Thank you,
Mark Kraft
Nasir from Pakistan
November, 04, 2007 10:29 AM
General Musharraf was left with no other option. In my opinion this has happened with tacit approval of the Bush administration. The judges of the Supreme Court overestimated their power. Had they taken a middle course they would have done a lot towards giving relief to common men. It is unfortunate that the Lal Masjid terrorists were released simply because the judges were against Pervez Musharraf. Nothing can justify the release of Lal Masjid terrorists.
sharpprogrammer from Pakistan
November, 04, 2007 10:31 AM
I support Mr. Musharraf in what he is doing. Pakistani sociey is not yet ripe for democracy. Instead of taking small steps towards democratic rule, people want to take giant leap which is impossible.

PROTECT YOUR FAMILY GET QUOTE
Home Insurance
Health Insurance
Mortgage
Cheap Car Cover
View blog reactions Copyright © 2007 Mohammad Munaeem Jamal. All rights reserved.